A derivative of a function in terms of x can be thought of as the rate of change of the function at a value of x. That's always the best strategy.The derivative of x is 1. On the other hand, if you buy software and gear like I do, you probably have 2 salesmen that you work with at 2 different retailers in Germany that you can shoot a txt or an email to any time and they will beat any advertized price because they know you're a good customer but not 'so good' that you will buy from them if they can't at least match the price.

Seems like an error that could be rectified by an email to B&H sales. Is this an error on their site - or do they ship the box AND provide the download/serial number?The quote says 'electronic delivery' above, which implies it's a download.

I´m from Germany and while B&H have international posting options, they want me to select superexpensive international shipping methods including duties during checkout.Īs the product is a digital download this should not be necessary. We saw the same fiasco with Kjaerhus when he tried to convince everybody that his MPL Pro was cleaner than every other limiter (which was of course completely false) simply by using way too fast release times on the competition compared to his own limiter.īesides, what on earth do you mean with 'tonal balance'? As far as I know, none of the proper limiters change the frequency response in any way? Unless you mean how the individual instruments are getting limited/ducked during the process (which is directly related to hold and release times). The problem with all these video and audio comparisons of limiters is that very rarely does the user, especially with an agenda, use the competing limiters properly.

Perhaps read the manual a bit and try to understand how to use the 'dynamic' algorithm? not sure if the screenshot of your Pro-L is what settings you used but if they are. Here's the video:Ĥ Gain Reduction Strategies - YouTubeWow. I've also done some tests with FG-X and Ozone5.

Izotope ozone 5 free download reddit